(Motorsport-Total.com) – Debate over Formula 1’s automobile security guidelines reignited at the Italian Grand Prix, with the race not restarting after Daniel Ricciardo suffered a technical failure and ended the race after 5 laps. end line behind the security automobile.
© Motorsport Images
The Italian Grand Prix ended behind the security automobile amid fan protests
Although race officers had been strict with the guidelines this time round – in contrast to final 12 months’s last-lap restart in Abu Dhabi that determined the championship – followers had been left with a bitter style of their mouths as the race was flagged for lack of a inexperienced end.
Red Bull staff principal Christian Horner mentioned he believed the race ought to have been red-flagged to make sure not less than one lap was accomplished and the race was not completed underneath the security automobile.
Horner was outraged by the “banal incident.”
“Personally, I’m disenchanted as a result of I really feel the security automobile caught the unsuitable automobile after which every thing was postponed as a result of it was a really minor incident,” mentioned the Red Bull staff boss.
“The automobile wasn’t in the fence or something. We all the time talked about how no one desires to complete the race with the security automobile. I felt there was sufficient time to restart the race. The race circumstances are higher than the security automobile.”
McLaren staff boss Andreas Seidl says Formula 1 groups didn’t agree on a plan to stop races from ending underneath the security automobile throughout discussions following the Abu Dhabi row final 12 months.
Seidl: “Couldn’t agree on a greater answer”
“After final 12 months’s incident in Abu Dhabi, there was a variety of dialogue between the FIA, Formula 1 and all the collaborating groups to see how the guidelines will be modified to make sure that races by no means finish and not using a protected automobile,” Seidl defined afterwards. competitors.
“But regardless that the FIA and Formula 1 pushed us all to discover a answer, it was as much as us as a staff, however we could not agree on a greater answer that was additionally truthful from a sporting perspective. That’s why I’m sorry, we have now to confess that such conditions can occur.”
Ending the race on yellow: is it an answer?
Interview: Formula 1 ought to flip to America to keep away from a Monza-like farce, says analyst Mark Surer. More Formula 1 Videos
Seidl says the FIA and Formula 1 have “actually tried every thing” to discover a method to change the guidelines so races are all the time green-flagged, however groups have expressed too many issues that the sport is positioned above the sporting side.
“We simply desire a choice that is truthful from a sporting standpoint and would not come as a sudden risk,” Seidl mentioned. “That’s why we could not agree on something higher than what we have now now. In the finish, we voted to maintain the guidelines as they’re. I keep in mind each staff voted that method. So I believe, shut this factor down.”
Horner Scissors: Could have been two rounds
For Horner, the downside at Monza was not attributable to the guidelines, however to a poorly timed security automobile process: “I believe it may have been mounted in time to be sincere. It was a case of the unsuitable automobile. [George Russell] acquired”.
“The security automobile could not catch the chief, which brought about a giant delay, so the leaders needed to catch up, after which the discipline automobiles needed to catch up. I believe you are able to do not less than one lap of the race. Even two.”
“You can all the time be taught one thing, however it goes towards the ideas we mentioned and it isn’t good to complete the race underneath the security automobile,” Horner mentioned. “If they knew they weren’t going to win it, they need to have put up a purple flag and restarted the race, however clearly that wasn’t the case.”
The FIA is contemplating modifications to security automobile laws
FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem held a summit at Monza after the race on Monday with race officers and Formula 1 staff managers to debate a spread of sporting points, with site visitors security laws prone to be mentioned.
One attainable option to make sure that the race all the time ends with a inexperienced flag is to jot down into the guidelines that an computerized purple flag ought to be proven if the security automobile is required to be a sure distance from the finish.
Ending the race behind the security automobile, is that mandatory? Yes!
We check out the rulebook and clarify why crossing the end line underneath yellow was not an option at the Italian Grand Prix in Monza. More Formula 1 Videos
When requested about the proposal, Alpine sporting director Alan Perman mentioned it sounded “improbable” however would inevitably have “unintended penalties”. “But it is occurred earlier than, we did it in Baku final 12 months and it went nicely,” says Permane.
Permane: Monza race end was ‘unlucky’
“I believe you’ll be able to write that into the guidelines. It’s not affordable. I’m positive there’s going to be one thing we do not like, however we’re right here to placed on a present. And [der Zieleinlauf in Monza] It is evident that it can’t be accepted.”
“It’s not an very best end, no one desires to complete underneath the security automobile. It’s pathetic for the followers, actually pathetic. We did not do every thing we may, that is for positive. But perhaps we need not go 50 kilometers each time. If the security automobile comes out earlier than the end, wave a purple flag. Maybe we’d like to ensure we have got the security automobile procedures proper and we’re engaged on getting them in control.”
“The downside is that later in the race you will have these automobiles in the security automobile durations,” explains Permane. “We’ve had countless discussions about how one can enhance this case, and altering this course of has many unintended penalties.”